Home

    • Knowing Nothing: Curiosity in Oral History

      Editor’s Note: The bi-weekly blog series “I, Witness,” seeks to explore the ethics, challenges, and possibilities of teaching and conducting oral history.

      image

      Joell Hallowell is a writer, editor, and experimental filmmaker living in San Francisco. She was an interviewer and assistant editor of Underground America (Voice of Witness 2010) and is currently working on a VOW-related project with the Evelyn & Walter Haas, Jr. Fund. She’s co-edited several oral history books, including Lawfully Wedded Wives (Spuyten Duyvil 2013) and Take Me to the River (Heyday Books, 2010). Her most recently finished project is a book of poetry and photography, Shadowed: Unheard Voices (The Press at CSU Fresno 2014) and she is currently compiling another oral history project in collaboration with Heyday; the personal stories of California preservationists, restorationists, and conservationists.


      My first experience in the realm of oral histories was as a videographer. For several years I stood silently behind the camera, listening to great stories and observing the oral historian’s techniques as together we collected over sixty video interviews based around one central issue. I was in the wide-angled position to observe what worked, and what didn’t; when the interviewer missed an opportunity, when impatience arose on his face, when he’d glance at his watch, check his notes, peak out the window as a car passed by. I cringed at every missed opportunity, every un-followed thread. As I prepared and edited the videos, I gradually began to understand that the least successful interviews were those in which the interviewer knew too much about his subject—he’d been to that restaurant, known that family. He’d heard a similar story before.

      Inadvertently, I spent those years learning to be an interviewer, but when it came time to set out on my own I thought it might be wise to pursue a more academic understanding of the oral history process. The highest rated how-to book on Amazon was dry and flat, with rules and suggestions that didn’t reflect what I’d learned in the field. The concept of collecting conversations was never mentioned, but that’s what I wanted to do. I was one of those kids who begged to sit at the grown-ups’ table, for the sake of their stories. I gobbled up every detail of my parents’ childhood and their youthful adventures, and loved when inexplicable laughter was connected to the terrifying symptoms of my grandparent’s decline.

      Driven by inquisitiveness, I’ve become a pretty good listener, but it’s difficult to maintain a spirit of curiosity when you know too much. After interviewing dozens of fishermen along the San Joaquin River, I’d learned about local fishing holes and soon found it difficult to maintain my sense of wonder. Once I’d heard all about the same “secret” riffle twenty times, it was impossible to ask again: “Where is that? Why do the fish congregate there?” Instead, I had to ask for something new every time, something that I was still curious about: “Who took you there the first time? What was his story?”

      I’ve recently interviewed a series of disconnected narrators: a man who’s dedicated his life to preserving copies of obscure 16mm film noir; the first undocumented student to be accepted into UCSF’s medical school; a man attempting to preserve the ruins of a wool mill near a mission in Solvang; the woman who founded the California Oak Foundation; and a transgender honor student at U.C. Berkeley. In all of those interviews it was easy to bring my natural curiosity to the process. I knew nothing. I knew nothing about the challenges of the transgendered, had absolutely no appreciation for film noir, and no real knowledge of oak trees—I was able to remain fascinated throughout many hours of interviews. I asked naïve questions, expressed my bewilderment, and dug deeper into the narrators’ worlds, well past the subject we’d met to discuss. We had naturally flowing conversations in which I admitted my ignorance, inserted uninformed opinions, and laughed inappropriately. But sometimes even the least informed interviewer will know too much. After 15 years and hundreds of interviews, I now follow these simple guidelines, all contrary to popular opinion:

      Strive to know nothing about your subject. Don’t plan any questions. Don’t bring a list. Arrive with no ideas, no opinions. Don’t think ahead, don’t set goals. Forget who you are. Pretend you are somebody else, somebody who has never visited Oklahoma, never shot a squirrel, never stepped on a rattlesnake. If you’ve heard a story like this before, put it away. If you’ve ever fished from a river, forget the feel of the tug on your line. If you know anything about fighter jets, erase all familiarity. Un-remember that you’ve ever read Jack London. Let go of all that you believe to be true.

      There’s something she’s never told anybody, and she might tell you. You want to hear a secret, to hear another secret. If you’ve seen his face before, the deep lines and creases, the pond-shaped brown spot across his cheek, don’t mistake him for your grandfather. You don’t know this man.

      Let yourself believe that you’ve never been there before. Don’t say: “I was there once with my mother, have you tried their ginger cake?” Instead say: “What happened there?” Say: “And then what happened?” Say: “Tell me more.” Say: “Really?” Say: “Wow.” Be ready to hear terrifying details. Be ready to let yourself laugh.

      Always record your interview, but never take notes. Never look down, never look out the rippled window and wonder what she might say next. Don’t worry that he hasn’t gotten to the point, made a case, made you cry. Let her tell you all about what it feels like to drink from a trough like a cow, and once she’s told you her story, ask her to tell you again. If you’ve ever been thirsty, take a sip of your water now and forget what thirst tastes like. Always bring water to an interview, a glass for her and a glass for you. Then say: “Really?” Say: “Then what happened?” Say: “Wow.”

      Read more on Tumblr...

    • 10th Anniversary Benefit: Photo Set

      Narrator Ashley Jacobs shares her story via Skype at Voice of Witness’ 10th Anniversary Benefit at the Brava Theater in San Francisco.

      Thank you to everyone who joined us last week for Voice of Witness’ 10th Anniversary Benefit! The evening was full of thought-provoking stories and inspiring conversation, beautiful music, and friends old and new. We hope you enjoyed yourselves as much as we did. Click here to see the full photo set on Facebook. Photos courtesy of Becky Remmell of Snap-Shoppe.

      Read more on Tumblr...

    • 10 Years of Voice of Witness Books: The Power of Oral History

      The Voice of Witness book series is now in its tenth year! Today, thanks to our community of supporters and readers like you, we now offer a robust education program and a publishing schedule that brings at least two Voice of Witness books into the world each year.

      “First-person narratives have a unique ability to reach people,” Dave Eggers writes in his introduction to the soon-to-be released Voice of Witness Reader: 10 Years of Amplifying Unheard Voices. “Studies have shown that when faced with a complicated issue affecting scores of people halfway across the world, we often get confused or become disengaged, faced with the monumental scale of, say, a civil war or a systemic problem hundreds of years in the making. But when we can focus on one person who has lived through that war or was caught in that system, we are able again to see it, to focus and empathize.”

      You can be one of the first to get an advance copy of The Voice of Witness Reader, signed by Dave Eggers, at our upcoming 10th Anniversary Benefit on May 6th. All proceeds benefit Voice of Witness books and our education program. Purchase your ticket today.  


      Read more on Tumblr...

    • Dave Eggers Awarded Amnesty International Chair



      Congratulations to Voice of Witness co-founder Dave Eggers, who was recently awarded the Amnesty International Chair at Ghent University. The chair is given annually to an individual who has made exceptional contributions in human rights. Dave and VOW Executive Director and co-founder Mimi Lok were interviewed by Ruth Joos on her program “The World Today,” airing on Belgium’s Radio One. Hear the full interview (in English) online here.



      Read more on Tumblr...

    • Call for Book Proposals

      Could you be our next Voice of Witness editor? We are seeking book proposals that address contemporary, underreported human rights issues. We’re looking for editors with:

      • Expertise in the field they’ll be covering
      • Willing participation from a pool of narrators
      • Editorial sensibility to bring out the level of detail necessary to do the stories justice

      Please email Luke Gerwe for proposal guidelines.

      Read more on Tumblr...